BodyComp™ Analysis
Empower your patients to change habits and take charge of their health. Go beyond the scale with the comprehensive point‑of‑care body composition analysis.

Comprehensive Analysis
- Comprehensive fluid, tissue, and metabolic analysis of the human body.
- Personalized picture of a patient’s fluid, muscle, and fat.
- History graphs and reference ranges facilitate easy data interpretation.

Validated Data
Actionable Results
- Detect changes in fluid, muscle, and fat
- Ensure your patient is losing weight the right way – by reducing fat mass while building skeletal muscle mass
- Help your patients set healthy targets such as maintaining muscle mass or increasing functional strength

Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What is the difference between bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) and bioimpedance analysis (BIA) for body composition monitoring, and which is more clinically accurate?
Bioimpedance analysis (BIA) and bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) are both non-invasive technologies that estimate body composition by measuring how the body conducts electrical current — but they differ fundamentally in how they do it, and those differences have meaningful consequences for clinical accuracy.
Standard BIA operates at a single fixed frequency, or at a small number of frequencies, which limits its ability to separate extracellular fluid from intracellular fluid or fully penetrate cell membranes. To compensate for this limitation, single-frequency BIA devices rely on population-based prediction equations to estimate fat mass, lean mass, and fluid volumes. This introduces meaningful error when applied to individual patients who differ from the reference population, such as those who are elderly, obese, managing chronic illness, or undergoing treatments like cancer therapy or GLP-1 medications that alter fluid distribution.
Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) takes a fundamentally different approach. By measuring electrical resistance and reactance across a broad spectrum of frequencies — ImpediMed’s SOZO® platform uses 256 frequencies up to 1,000 kHz — BIS derives fluid and tissue measurements directly from each individual’s own biological data, without relying on population averages. This enables accurate, independent measurement of extracellular fluid, intracellular fluid, skeletal muscle mass, and fat mass in a single 30-second scan. ImpediMed’s BIS technology has been validated against gold standard methods including deuterium oxide dilution and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). For clinical applications where individual-level precision matters — such as monitoring muscle preservation during weight loss, detecting fluid changes in heart failure, or tracking body composition through cancer survivorship — BIS delivers a meaningfully higher standard of accuracy than standard BIA.
Q2: What is phase angle and why is it an important body composition measurement?
Phase angle is a measurement derived from bioimpedance analysis that serves as a direct indicator of cellular health and integrity. When an electrical current passes through the body, it encounters two types of opposition: resistance (from fluids) and reactance (from cell membranes). Phase angle is the relationship between these two forces — specifically, the degree to which cell membranes are able to store electrical charge and resist the passage of current. A higher phase angle indicates cell membranes that are intact, well-hydrated, and functioning normally. A lower phase angle reflects compromised cell membrane integrity, reduced cellular hydration, or loss of metabolically active tissue — all of which are associated with poorer health status and clinical outcomes.
Research across a wide range of clinical populations has established phase angle as a meaningful prognostic marker. Low phase angle has been associated with malnutrition, sarcopenia (age-related muscle loss), frailty, poorer surgical outcomes, reduced quality of life, and increased mortality risk in conditions including cancer, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and HIV. In oncology specifically, phase angle has been studied as an indicator of nutritional status and functional reserve in cancer patients, where it can help identify patients at risk of poor treatment tolerance before symptoms become apparent.
ImpediMed’s SOZO® BodyComp™ Analysis reports phase angle alongside fat mass, lean mass, skeletal muscle mass, and fluid volumes, giving clinicians a complete picture of both body composition and underlying cellular health in a single non-invasive 30-second scan. Because BIS technology measures across 256 frequencies, it captures the full bioelectrical profile needed to derive a precise and reproducible phase angle reading — making it a reliable metric for longitudinal monitoring in clinical populations where tracking cellular health over time is essential to personalized care.
Q3: Why are body composition fluid outputs — total body water, extracellular fluid, and intracellular fluid — important clinical measurements?
Body weight is largely water. In a healthy adult, total body water (TBW) accounts for roughly 50–60% of body weight — and the distribution of that water between the body’s fluid compartments is one of the most sensitive and clinically informative indicators of physiological status available. Yet standard body composition assessments, and certainly weight monitoring alone, provide no insight into fluid distribution whatsoever. Understanding not just how much fluid a patient carries, but where that fluid is and how it is shifting over time, opens a dimension of clinical visibility that is simply unavailable from the scale or BMI.
Beyond measuring each compartment in isolation, the ratio of extracellular to total body fluid provides a particularly powerful clinical signal. In a healthy individual, ECF represents approximately 40–42% of total body water. As this ratio rises — meaning a greater proportion of body water is sitting outside cells rather than inside them — it reflects a shift away from lean, metabolically active tissue toward a state of cellular compromise, inflammation, or fluid overload. Tracking this ratio longitudinally on the SOZO® platform gives clinicians a sensitive, individual-level metric that captures physiological deterioration or improvement with greater precision than any single compartment measurement alone.
Q4: Why is longitudinal body composition tracking with BodyComp™ Analysis more valuable than a single measurement?
A single body composition measurement provides a useful snapshot, but its clinical value is limited — it tells you where a patient is, not where they are going. Longitudinal body composition tracking, by contrast, transforms each individual measurement into a data point on a trajectory, enabling clinicians to detect meaningful trends, evaluate whether interventions are working, and intervene early when the body is moving in the wrong direction before that change becomes clinically significant or symptomatic.
Many of the most clinically important changes in body composition are gradual and invisible to routine monitoring. A patient on a GLP-1 medication may be losing weight consistently week over week while simultaneously losing skeletal muscle mass — a shift that carries long-term metabolic and functional consequences but registers as nothing but success on a scale. A cancer survivor may be gaining fat mass and losing lean mass at stable body weight, increasing their risk of recurrence and reducing quality of life, with no outward sign of change. In each of these cases, serial BodyComp™ Analysis measurements create a longitudinal record that makes these otherwise hidden trends visible and actionable, allowing clinicians to intervene sooner to support better patient outcomes.
References
- Birzniece V, et al. A critical evaluation of bioimpedance spectroscopy analysis in estimating body composition during GH treatment: comparison with bromide dilution and dual X-ray absorptiometry. Eur J Endo 2015;172(1):21-8.
- Van Den Ham ECH, et al. Bioimpedance Analysis Compared to Isotope Dilution, Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, and Anthropometry. JASN 1999;10(5):1067-79.
- Cicone et al. (2019) Agreement between deuterium oxide and bioimpedance spectroscopy measures of total body water. Presented on February 14th at the Southeast American College of Sports Medicine Annual Meeting in Greenville SC. Also, to be presented at the American College of Sports Medicine National Conference May 28- June 1st in Orlando, FL.
- Kerr A, et al. Validation of bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy to measure total body water in resistance trained males. Int J Sport Nutr and Exer 2015; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.2014-0188.
- Moon JR, et al. Total body water changes after an exercise intervention tracked using bioimpedance spectroscopy: a deuterium oxide comparison. Clin Nutr 2009;1-10.
- Moon JR, et al. Total body water estimations in healthy men and women using bioimpedance spectroscopy: a deuterium oxide comparison. Nutr & Metab 2008; https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-5-7.
- Esco, MR et al. Agreement between supine and standing bioimpedance spectroscopy devices and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for body composition determination. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2019;39(5):355-361. Correlation coefficients reflect measurements taken with SOZO.
- Papathakis, PC et al. Comparison of isotope dilution with bioimpedance spectroscopy and anthropometry for assessment of body composition in asymptomatic HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected breastfeeding mothers. Am J Clin Nutr 005;82:538-46.